Unsupervised Learning for Document Clustering

What is Document Clustering?

Imagine you have a massive library, and the books aren’t labeled. You could spend hours figuring out where one belongs. Document clustering is like a clever librarian who, instead of knowing exactly what’s in each book, can group them by theme, topic, or style based on the content. No pre-existing labels are needed.

Document clustering leverages mathematical techniques to identify natural groupings within large volumes of text data. Whether it’s clustering news articles, research papers, or social media comments, the aim is to organize documents into meaningful clusters where similar documents are grouped together.

But here’s the key: in the world of data science, document clustering isn’t just a sorting task. It has deeper applications like:

Large-scale text analytics: Grouping vast collections of documents for analysis.
Topic modeling: Discovering hidden themes in large corpora.
Knowledge discovery: Finding unknown relationships in unstructured text data.

Example: Imagine working with millions of research papers and wanting to find emergent topics. Instead of reading them all, document clustering automatically groups papers discussing similar subjects—saving you an enormous amount of time and enabling you to surface patterns that would be impossible to detect manually.

Role of Unsupervised Learning

Here’s the deal: unsupervised learning is like letting an algorithm navigate a map without a guide. It doesn’t rely on labeled data (no supervision) but instead looks for structure in the data itself. This makes it perfect for document clustering. Why? Because in most real-world scenarios, you won’t have labeled documents to begin with—no one has manually categorized thousands of reports, reviews, or articles for you.

So why is unsupervised learning so valuable here?

Scalability: You can throw millions of documents at an unsupervised model, and it will still make sense of them without needing any labeled training data.
Domain-independence: You don’t need domain expertise to create labels; the clustering process reveals the underlying structure of the documents for you. That’s like working in legal, healthcare, or finance without needing specific labeled datasets for each domain.

In a nutshell, unsupervised learning lets the data speak for itself, finding hidden patterns that even you might not have anticipated.

Challenges in Document Clustering

High Dimensionality of Text Data

You might be wondering: why is text data so tricky to cluster? Well, text data is incredibly high-dimensional. Think about it—every unique word in your corpus represents a feature. For even a moderately sized dataset, you could be dealing with tens of thousands of features. This is what we call the curse of dimensionality.

What happens when you try to cluster in such a high-dimensional space? Clusters can become meaningless because all documents start to appear equally distant from one another. This means traditional clustering algorithms like K-Means often struggle because they rely on calculating distances between points, and in high-dimensional space, distances lose their significance.

Example: Imagine trying to group documents by their subject matter, but your feature space is flooded with irrelevant terms. You might end up with clusters where scientific papers on “neural networks” are grouped with blog posts on “network cables” just because they both have the word “network” in them.

To combat this, dimensionality reduction techniques like Latent Semantic Analysis (LSA) or UMAP are often applied to transform the text into a lower-dimensional space, retaining only the most important features.

Ambiguity in Textual Data

Here’s a challenge: language is messy. Words have multiple meanings (polysemy) and different words can mean the same thing (synonymy). If you’re clustering without addressing this, your algorithm might cluster the word “bank” (financial institution) with documents about “river banks.”

To solve this, you need a semantic understanding of the text, which goes beyond counting word frequencies (like in traditional TF-IDF). Techniques like word embeddings (Word2Vec, GloVe) or BERT embeddings can help here. These models capture the context around words, so “bank” in the context of finance won’t be confused with “bank” in a geographical context.

Example: By using embeddings, you ensure that a news article about “climate change” is clustered with articles on “global warming” instead of something irrelevant like “political climate.”

Choosing the Right Number of Clusters

This might surprise you: choosing the right number of clusters isn’t as straightforward as you’d think. It’s not just about using the elbow method or silhouette scores and calling it a day. In document clustering, the data’s complexity means these traditional methods often fall short.

You might deal with clusters that aren’t spherical, or data that’s noisy and highly imbalanced. To address this:

Hierarchical clustering allows you to view the data at different granularity levels, helping you find the “natural” number of clusters.
Density-based methods like DBSCAN can discover arbitrary-shaped clusters and are great for text data that might not conform to typical spherical clusters.
Bayesian nonparametric models (like the Dirichlet Process) offer a flexible way to infer the number of clusters based on the data, dynamically adjusting the number of clusters as more data becomes available.

Preprocessing for Document Clustering

Text Representation Techniques

Here’s the deal: before you even start clustering, how you represent your text matters a lot. Think of it like setting up a foundation before building a house. If you don’t get it right, no matter how good your clustering algorithm is, the results won’t make sense.

Let’s talk about some of the key text representation techniques you’ll come across:

TF-IDF (Term Frequency-Inverse Document Frequency): If you’ve ever worked with BoW (Bag of Words), TF-IDF is the refined version. It gives you a sparse matrix where common words (like “the” or “is”) are down-weighted, and rare but important words get more weight. It’s still quite popular because it’s simple and effective for smaller, more traditional datasets. But here’s the catch: it doesn’t capture the context of the words. “Apple” in the context of fruit and “Apple” as the tech giant will be treated the same.

from sklearn.feature_extraction.text import TfidfVectorizer

# Sample documents
documents = [
    "Machine learning is fascinating.",
    "Deep learning and neural networks are subsets of machine learning.",
    "Natural language processing is a key aspect of AI.",
]

# Create a TF-IDF vectorizer
tfidf_vectorizer = TfidfVectorizer(stop_words='english')

# Transform the documents into TF-IDF matrix
tfidf_matrix = tfidf_vectorizer.fit_transform(documents)

# Show the resulting matrix
print("TF-IDF Matrix shape:", tfidf_matrix.shape)
print(tfidf_matrix.toarray())

This will create a sparse matrix where each column represents a term, and each row is a document.

Word2Vec and GloVe: These are dense vector representations, where each word is embedded in a continuous vector space. Unlike TF-IDF, which can only capture word frequencies, Word2Vec captures semantic relationships between words. You might be wondering why that’s important: well, it allows you to cluster documents based on the meaning of words, rather than just their occurrence. So, documents about “Apple” the company won’t be clustered with documents about “apple” the fruit. GloVe, on the other hand, focuses on capturing word co-occurrences across the entire corpus, giving you a global sense of relationships.

from gensim.models import Word2Vec
from nltk.tokenize import word_tokenize

# Tokenize the documents
tokenized_docs = [word_tokenize(doc.lower()) for doc in documents]

# Train Word2Vec model
w2v_model = Word2Vec(sentences=tokenized_docs, vector_size=100, window=5, min_count=1, workers=4)

# Get vector representation for a word
word_vector = w2v_model.wv['learning']
print("Vector for 'learning':", word_vector)

# You can also use average vectors for document representations
doc_vector = sum(w2v_model.wv[word] for word in tokenized_docs[0]) / len(tokenized_docs[0])
print("Document vector (first doc):", doc_vector)

Here, we’re using Word2Vec to get dense vector representations for each word and document.

BERT Embeddings: Now, if you want to take context understanding to the next level, BERT is your go-to. Unlike Word2Vec, which provides the same vector for each word regardless of context, BERT generates dynamic embeddings that change based on the sentence. This makes it perfect for clustering documents where nuanced differences in context are critical. The trade-off? It’s computationally expensive, so you’d only want to use this when your clustering needs semantic depth.

from transformers import BertTokenizer, BertModel
import torch

# Load pre-trained BERT model and tokenizer
tokenizer = BertTokenizer.from_pretrained('bert-base-uncased')
model = BertModel.from_pretrained('bert-base-uncased')

# Encode the document
inputs = tokenizer("Machine learning is fascinating.", return_tensors="pt")
outputs = model(**inputs)

# Get the CLS token representation for the sentence (usually used for document representation)
cls_embedding = outputs.last_hidden_state[:, 0, :]
print("BERT CLS token embedding:", cls_embedding)

Using BERT, you can capture contextual embeddings, where the meaning of words changes based on the surrounding text.

When to Use What: If you’re dealing with a small dataset where simple word frequencies will do the trick, stick with TF-IDF. For richer representations and more semantic-aware clustering, opt for embeddings like Word2Vec or BERT, especially when the context and meaning behind words matter.

Dimensionality Reduction Techniques

Latent Semantic Analysis (LSA) using SVD: LSA reduces the number of features by identifying latent patterns in the data. It essentially performs SVD (Singular Value Decomposition) to reduce your TF-IDF matrix into lower dimensions, capturing only the most important features. Think of it like condensing a large document into its most significant sentences, removing all the fluff.

from sklearn.decomposition import TruncatedSVD

# Apply Truncated SVD for dimensionality reduction (Latent Semantic Analysis)
lsa = TruncatedSVD(n_components=2)
lsa_matrix = lsa.fit_transform(tfidf_matrix)

print("LSA Transformed shape:", lsa_matrix.shape)
print(lsa_matrix)

LSA reduces dimensionality, allowing you to represent documents in fewer dimensions while preserving essential information.

UMAP (Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection): Now, this one’s exciting! Unlike PCA or LSA, UMAP preserves both local and global structure, making it ideal for text data that’s spread out in complicated ways. It’s much better at visualizing clusters and helps uncover non-linear relationships in your data, which could be missed by linear techniques like LSA.

import umap

# Reduce dimensions using UMAP
umap_model = umap.UMAP(n_components=2)
umap_embedding = umap_model.fit_transform(tfidf_matrix.toarray())

print("UMAP Reduced Embeddings:")
print(umap_embedding)

With UMAP, you can capture both local and global structures of your data, often revealing more nuanced clusters than linear methods like LSA.

Advanced Clustering Techniques for Text

Topic Modeling Techniques

Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA)

You might be wondering: how does LDA fit into document clustering? Here’s the deal: LDA isn’t a clustering algorithm in the traditional sense, but a probabilistic topic model. It assumes each document is a mixture of topics, and each topic is a distribution over words. When applied, it uncovers latent topics that can be used to group documents based on their dominant themes.

Let’s dive into the code:

import numpy as np
import pandas as pd
from sklearn.feature_extraction.text import CountVectorizer
from sklearn.decomposition import LatentDirichletAllocation

# Sample documents
documents = [
    "Machine learning is fascinating.",
    "Deep learning and neural networks are subsets of machine learning.",
    "Natural language processing is a key aspect of AI.",
]

# Vectorize the documents using CountVectorizer (BoW representation)
count_vectorizer = CountVectorizer(stop_words='english')
doc_term_matrix = count_vectorizer.fit_transform(documents)

# Apply LDA
lda = LatentDirichletAllocation(n_components=2, random_state=42)
lda.fit(doc_term_matrix)

# Display topics
topics = lda.components_
terms = count_vectorizer.get_feature_names_out()
for index, topic in enumerate(topics):
    print(f"Topic {index+1}:")
    print([terms[i] for i in topic.argsort()[-5:]])

LDA clusters documents by discovering the latent topics they discuss. This is particularly useful when you have a large corpus and want to uncover hidden themes.

Dynamic Topic Modeling (DTM)

Dynamic Topic Modeling extends LDA by allowing topics to evolve over time, which is ideal when you’re working with documents generated across different time periods (e.g., news articles or research papers). While gensim and other libraries don’t natively support DTM, tools like DTM from MALLET or custom implementations using pyLDAvis can be used.

Here’s a conceptual example:

# DTM isn't directly available in sklearn, but MALLET's DTM implementation can be used.
!./mallet run cc.mallet.topics.tui.TopicModelApp --input data.mallet --num-topics 10 --output-state topic-state.gz --output-doc-topics topic-doc.txt --output-topic-keys topic-keys.txt

The idea is that DTM adapts over time, allowing the topics to change, which gives you better clustering when time is a crucial factor.

Self-organizing Maps (SOMs)

You might not expect this, but Self-organizing Maps (SOMs) provide an alternative way to cluster high-dimensional text data. SOMs work by creating a grid (usually 2D), where similar documents are mapped close to each other, preserving topological relationships. It’s a form of unsupervised neural network.

Let’s see it in action:

from minisom import MiniSom
from sklearn.preprocessing import normalize

# Normalize the document vectors
doc_vectors = normalize(tfidf_matrix.toarray())

# Initialize SOM
som = MiniSom(x=10, y=10, input_len=doc_vectors.shape[1], sigma=0.5, learning_rate=0.5)

# Train SOM
som.random_weights_init(doc_vectors)
som.train_random(doc_vectors, 100)

# Visualize SOM grid
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
plt.figure(figsize=(7, 7))
for i, doc in enumerate(doc_vectors):
    w = som.winner(doc)
    plt.text(w[0], w[1], str(i), ha='center', va='center', bbox=dict(facecolor='white', alpha=0.5))
plt.show()

SOMs map high-dimensional data to a 2D grid, making them great for visualizing document clusters while preserving the relationships between documents.

Deep Learning-based Approaches

Autoencoders for Document Clustering

Here’s where things get interesting. Autoencoders are unsupervised neural networks that learn compressed, latent representations of data. You can use them to reduce dimensionality and then cluster the learned representations.

from tensorflow.keras.layers import Input, Dense
from tensorflow.keras.models import Model

# Define autoencoder
input_dim = tfidf_matrix.shape[1]
input_layer = Input(shape=(input_dim,))
encoded = Dense(128, activation='relu')(input_layer)
encoded = Dense(64, activation='relu')(encoded)

decoded = Dense(128, activation='relu')(encoded)
decoded = Dense(input_dim, activation='sigmoid')(decoded)

# Autoencoder model
autoencoder = Model(input_layer, decoded)
autoencoder.compile(optimizer='adam', loss='binary_crossentropy')

# Train autoencoder
autoencoder.fit(tfidf_matrix.toarray(), tfidf_matrix.toarray(), epochs=50, batch_size=256, shuffle=True)

# Extract the encoder part for clustering
encoder = Model(input_layer, encoded)
encoded_docs = encoder.predict(tfidf_matrix.toarray())

# Apply K-Means on the encoded representations
kmeans = KMeans(n_clusters=2, random_state=42)
kmeans.fit(encoded_docs)

In this case, we reduce dimensionality using an autoencoder and apply K-Means clustering on the encoded representations. Autoencoders can capture complex patterns in text, making clustering more meaningful.

Deep Embedded Clustering (DEC)

DEC combines autoencoders with clustering, learning both the latent representation and cluster assignment simultaneously. You can use libraries like Keras-DEC for implementing this.

BERT for Clustering

When you use BERT embeddings, you’re essentially capturing the context of each document, which makes clustering much more meaningful, especially for documents that have subtle differences.

from sentence_transformers import SentenceTransformer

# Load pre-trained BERT model for sentence embeddings
model = SentenceTransformer('bert-base-nli-mean-tokens')

# Generate BERT embeddings for documents
bert_embeddings = model.encode(documents)

# Apply K-Means on BERT embeddings
kmeans = KMeans(n_clusters=2, random_state=42)
kmeans_labels = kmeans.fit_predict(bert_embeddings)

# Visualize the clusters
plt.scatter(bert_embeddings[:, 0], bert_embeddings[:, 1], c=kmeans_labels)
plt.title('BERT-based Clustering')
plt.show()

With BERT, you’re clustering based on semantic similarity, which is especially useful for clustering documents that are rich in meaning but sparse in explicit keywords.

Evaluating Document Clustering

Cluster Validation Metrics

You might be wondering: how do we know if our clusters make sense? Let’s explore some advanced validation metrics for unsupervised learning:

Adjusted Rand Index (ARI): Measures the similarity between the clustering result and a ground truth label (if available).

from sklearn.metrics import adjusted_rand_score

# Assuming true_labels are available
ari_score = adjusted_rand_score(true_labels, kmeans_labels)
print("ARI Score:", ari_score)

Mutual Information (MI) Score: Measures the amount of information shared between the predicted and true clusters.

from sklearn.metrics import normalized_mutual_info_score

nmi_score = normalized_mutual_info_score(true_labels, kmeans_labels)
print("NMI Score:", nmi_score)

Silhouette Coefficient: Measures how similar each document is to its own cluster compared to other clusters.

from sklearn.metrics import silhouette_score

silhouette_avg = silhouette_score(lsa_matrix, kmeans_labels)
print("Silhouette Score:", silhouette_avg)

Human-in-the-loop Evaluation

Sometimes, metrics aren’t enough. You need domain experts to evaluate clusters and give feedback. One approach is to extract the most representative documents for each cluster and have experts review them:

# Get top terms per cluster
top_terms = np.argsort(kmeans.cluster_centers_, axis=1)[:, -5:]
terms = count_vectorizer.get_feature_names_out()

for i, cluster in enumerate(top_terms):
    print(f"Cluster {i+1} key terms:", [terms[t] for t in cluster])

Intrinsic vs. Extrinsic Evaluation

You can measure clustering quality using both intrinsic measures (like silhouette score) and extrinsic validation, where you benchmark cluster performance against external tasks (e.g., document classification or retrieval).

Intrinsic evaluation focuses on cluster cohesion (documents in the same cluster should be similar) and separation (clusters should be distinct).
Extrinsic evaluation involves comparing your clusters to ground truth labels or evaluating how well the clusters perform in a downstream task like text classification.

Case Study: Real-world Application of Document Clustering
Industry Example 1: Legal Document Clustering
When dealing with thousands of legal documents, manually categorizing them is not only inefficient but nearly impossible. Document clustering in this domain is a game-changer. You can use clustering to:
Organize legal documents by case types (e.g., criminal, civil, intellectual property).
Detect similarities between cases, finding legal precedents automatically.
Discover hidden patterns across case files that can reveal trends in court rulings or identify patterns in legal arguments.
Here’s a practical approach using BERT embeddings and K-Means for clustering legal documents:

from sentence_transformers import SentenceTransformer
from sklearn.cluster import KMeans
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt

# Sample legal case summaries
legal_documents = [
    "The defendant was charged with theft in 2019.",
    "In a landmark intellectual property case, the plaintiff argued against patent infringement.",
    "The court ruled in favor of the tenant in a civil lawsuit regarding property disputes.",
]

# Load pre-trained BERT model for sentence embeddings
bert_model = SentenceTransformer('bert-base-nli-mean-tokens')

# Generate embeddings for legal documents
legal_embeddings = bert_model.encode(legal_documents)

# Apply K-Means clustering
kmeans_legal = KMeans(n_clusters=2, random_state=42)
legal_labels = kmeans_legal.fit_predict(legal_embeddings)

# Visualize the clusters
plt.scatter(legal_embeddings[:, 0], legal_embeddings[:, 1], c=legal_labels)
plt.title('Legal Document Clustering')
plt.show()

# Output cluster centroids for interpretability
centroids = kmeans_legal.cluster_centers_
print("Cluster Centroids:", centroids)

Here, BERT embeddings capture the legal context, allowing you to cluster documents based on their meaning, not just keyword overlap. This helps identify similarities between cases, which can assist legal teams in finding precedents or categorizing documents faster.

Challenges:

Imbalanced classes: For example, criminal cases may dominate, leading to fewer clusters for civil cases.
Data sparsity: Legal documents often contain formal language with low-frequency, domain-specific terms, requiring advanced preprocessing.

Industry Example 2: News Article Clustering

News organizations produce enormous volumes of content daily. To keep up, many media companies cluster news articles to:

Group similar stories (e.g., politics, sports, or technology).
Track the evolution of a story over time, like clustering articles around a single event.
Personalize content delivery, showing users more of what they are interested in based on cluster preferences.

Let’s explore this using Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) for topic modeling:

from sklearn.decomposition import LatentDirichletAllocation
from sklearn.feature_extraction.text import CountVectorizer
import numpy as np

# Sample news articles
news_articles = [
    "The president signed a new bill into law today.",
    "The tech industry is experiencing massive growth due to AI innovations.",
    "In sports, the local team won the championship after a thrilling match."
]

# Convert articles to term-frequency matrix
vectorizer = CountVectorizer(stop_words='english')
news_matrix = vectorizer.fit_transform(news_articles)

# Apply LDA for topic modeling
lda_model = LatentDirichletAllocation(n_components=3, random_state=42)
lda_model.fit(news_matrix)

# Get the topics and top words for each
terms = vectorizer.get_feature_names_out()
for idx, topic in enumerate(lda_model.components_):
    print(f"Topic {idx + 1}:")
    print([terms[i] for i in topic.argsort()[-5:]])

In this example, LDA uncovers topics like politics, technology, and sports, which can be used to group articles. Newsrooms can use this method to identify clusters of articles related to similar events or topics, enabling efficient content management.

Challenges:

Story evolution: News stories evolve over time. This can be addressed by dynamic topic modeling (DTM), which allows topics to change and grow as new articles are published.
Personalization: Clusters need to align with user interests, so ongoing feedback loops and personalization algorithms are crucial.

Industry Example 3: Customer Feedback Analysis

This might surprise you: document clustering isn’t just for formal or structured text. In customer feedback analysis, clustering is used to categorize feedback or reviews into actionable insights, identifying common themes (e.g., product quality, customer service).

Let’s take a real-world example of clustering customer feedback using TF-IDF and DBSCAN:

from sklearn.feature_extraction.text import TfidfVectorizer
from sklearn.cluster import DBSCAN
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt

# Sample customer feedback
customer_reviews = [
    "I love the product! It's amazing.",
    "The shipping was delayed, very frustrating.",
    "Customer service was super helpful, great experience.",
    "The product quality is disappointing.",
]

# Convert reviews into TF-IDF matrix
tfidf_vectorizer = TfidfVectorizer(stop_words='english')
tfidf_reviews = tfidf_vectorizer.fit_transform(customer_reviews)

# Apply DBSCAN clustering (density-based)
dbscan_model = DBSCAN(eps=0.5, min_samples=2)
dbscan_labels = dbscan_model.fit_predict(tfidf_reviews.toarray())

# Visualize the clusters
plt.scatter(tfidf_reviews.toarray()[:, 0], tfidf_reviews.toarray()[:, 1], c=dbscan_labels)
plt.title('Customer Feedback Clustering')
plt.show()

DBSCAN is great for this use case because it doesn’t require you to pre-define the number of clusters, and it handles noise well (e.g., random outliers or irrelevant reviews). This can help businesses identify which areas (e.g., shipping issues, product quality) require attention.

Challenges:

Imbalanced feedback: Some topics (e.g., shipping issues) may dominate, leaving other themes underrepresented.
Sparsity: Customer reviews tend to be short and sparse, so effective preprocessing (e.g., lemmatization, stopword removal) is crucial to avoid poor clustering results.

Common Dataset Challenges & Strategies

Imbalanced Classes: Across all industries, certain classes (e.g., civil cases in legal documents or shipping complaints in customer feedback) might dominate. You can tackle this by:
- Oversampling the underrepresented clusters.
- Using adaptive clustering methods like HDBSCAN, which can find clusters of varying density.
Data Sparsity: Whether it’s legal jargon or informal customer reviews, sparse representations can hurt clustering performance. Preprocessing strategies like n-grams, lemmatization, and domain-specific tokenization can help reduce sparsity.
Evaluation: Without ground truth labels, it’s often challenging to evaluate clustering quality. In such cases:
- Use silhouette scores and cohesion metrics.
- Perform human-in-the-loop validation, where domain experts review clusters for interpretability and coherence.

Conclusion

In this guide, we’ve taken a deep dive into the world of unsupervised learning for document clustering, exploring advanced techniques and real-world applications that go far beyond the basics. From preprocessing your data with techniques like TF-IDF and BERT embeddings to implementing clustering algorithms like K-Means, DBSCAN, and even deep learning approaches like Autoencoders and DEC, you now have a comprehensive toolkit to tackle clustering challenges in a variety of domains.

We’ve walked through real-world scenarios, showing how clustering can be applied in legal document organization, news article tracking, and customer feedback analysis. In each case, document clustering helps you uncover hidden patterns, organize unstructured data efficiently, and ultimately derive actionable insights.

But remember: choosing the right clustering technique isn’t a one-size-fits-all approach. Depending on your dataset’s characteristics—whether it’s high-dimensional, imbalanced, or sparse—the preprocessing strategies and algorithms you select will vary.

Key Takeaways:

Text representation matters: The choice between sparse and dense representations, like TF-IDF versus BERT, can significantly impact your clustering results.
Advanced clustering techniques: Methods like LDA, Spectral Clustering, and Autoencoders offer more nuanced clustering, especially for complex datasets.
Evaluation is crucial: Use intrinsic and extrinsic validation metrics to ensure your clusters are meaningful. In many cases, human-in-the-loop evaluation is essential for interpreting clusters in real-world applications.

With the right approach, you can leverage document clustering to drive efficiency, uncover insights, and make sense of vast amounts of text data, no matter the domain. So, as you apply these techniques to your next project, remember—clustering isn’t just about grouping documents; it’s about unlocking the hidden structure within your data.

Unsupervised Learning for Document Clustering

What is Document Clustering?

Role of Unsupervised Learning

Challenges in Document Clustering

High Dimensionality of Text Data

Ambiguity in Textual Data

Choosing the Right Number of Clusters

Preprocessing for Document Clustering

Text Representation Techniques

Dimensionality Reduction Techniques

Popular Document Clustering Algorithms

K-Means Clustering

Hierarchical Clustering

Gaussian Mixture Model (GMM)

Spectral Clustering

DBSCAN

Advanced Clustering Techniques for Text

Topic Modeling Techniques

Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA)

Dynamic Topic Modeling (DTM)

Self-organizing Maps (SOMs)

Deep Learning-based Approaches

Autoencoders for Document Clustering

Deep Embedded Clustering (DEC)

BERT for Clustering

Evaluating Document Clustering

Cluster Validation Metrics

Human-in-the-loop Evaluation

Intrinsic vs. Extrinsic Evaluation

Industry Example 2: News Article Clustering

Industry Example 3: Customer Feedback Analysis

Common Dataset Challenges & Strategies

Conclusion

Leave a Comment Cancel Reply